CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low) in Cape Verde
Cape Verde: CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low) was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Cape Verde, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Cape Verde is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Cape Verde peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2007 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2016.
That places Cape Verde 16th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low) in Cape Verde, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +14.3% |
| 2008 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -12.5% |
| 2015 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2017 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2018 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +14.3% |
| 2021 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -12.5% |
| 2023 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Cape Verde compared with similar countries
- Cape Verde's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Cape Verde's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.2× the median. (40 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.65 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cape Verde
- 16 Azerbaijan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Cameroon 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Guyana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Kenya 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Samoa 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Tanzania 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Togo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Vietnam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Cape Verde
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 3.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2019)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 5.84 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2019)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0013 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2019)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 3.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Cape Verde?
- Cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Cape Verde was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Cape Verde?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2007.
- What is the lowest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Cape Verde?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2016.
- How does Cape Verde rank for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating?
- Cape Verde ranks 16th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating rising or falling in Cape Verde?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cape Verde data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The quality of budgetary and financial management criterion assesses the extent to which there is: (a) a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities; (b) effective financial management systems to ensure that the budget is implemented as intended in a controlled and predictable way; and (c) timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely audit of public accounts and effective arrangements for follow up.