Statizoid

CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Cambodia

Cambodia: CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
16th
of 85 countries
All-time high
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2009
All-time low
2.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Cambodia, 2005–2025

012342005201520252005: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2006: 3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3 1=low to 6=high2008: 3 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2015: 3 1=low to 6=high2016: 3 1=low to 6=high2017: 3 1=low to 6=high2018: 3 1=low to 6=high2019: 3 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2025, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Cambodia stood at 3.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

The figure is up 16.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Cambodia peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2009 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

Cambodia ranks 16th of 85 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.

CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Cambodia, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 2.5 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3 1=low to 6=high +20.0%
2007 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3.5 1=low to 6=high +16.7%
2010 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3 1=low to 6=high -14.3%
2016 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 3.5 1=low to 6=high +16.7%
2021 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Cambodia compared with similar countries

  • Cambodia's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.2× the median. (39 countries reporting)
  • Cambodia's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.2× the median. (16 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3 1=low to 6=high 2.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.25 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Cambodia

  1. 16 Azerbaijan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 16 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 16 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 16 Cape Verde 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 16 Cameroon 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 16 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 16 Guyana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 16 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 16 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 16 Kenya 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 16 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 16 Samoa 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 16 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 16 Tanzania, United Republic of 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 16 Togo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 16 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 16 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 16 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 16 Viet Nam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Cambodia

All data for Cambodia →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Cambodia?
Cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Cambodia was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Cambodia?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
What is the lowest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Cambodia?
The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Cambodia rank for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating?
Cambodia ranks 16th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating rising or falling in Cambodia?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Cambodia data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Cambodia. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-quality-of-budgetary-and-financial-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-quality-of-budgetary-and-financial-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/cambodia/">CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Cambodia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The quality of budgetary and financial management criterion assesses the extent to which there is: (a) a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities; (b) effective financial management systems to ensure that the budget is implemented as intended in a controlled and predictable way; and (c) timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely audit of public accounts and effective arrangements for follow up.