What is the highest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?

The highest recorded value was 3.25 1=low to 6=high in 2008.

What is the lowest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?

The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2006.

How does Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for cpia quality of public administration rating?

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 5th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.

Is cpia quality of public administration rating rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?

Over the last ten years it is up 0.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?

The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

CPIA quality of public administration rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)

Name: CPIA quality of public administration rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
Creator: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): CPIA quality of public administration rating was 3.12 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)

3.12 1=low to 6=high

Change on year

unchanged

Rank

5th

of 42 groups

All-time high

3.25 1=low to 6=high

in 2008

All-time low

3 1=low to 6=high

in 2006

Years of data

2005–2025

CPIA quality of public administration rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), 2005–2025

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia quality of public administration rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) is 3.12 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia quality of public administration rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 3.25 1=low to 6=high in 2008 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 5th of 42 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.

CPIA quality of public administration rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year

Annual values for CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), 2005 to 2025.
Year	1=low to 6=high	Change
2005	3.1 1=low to 6=high	—
2006	3 1=low to 6=high	-3.2%
2007	3.06 1=low to 6=high	+2.1%
2008	3.25 1=low to 6=high	+6.1%
2009	3.17 1=low to 6=high	-2.6%
2010	3.17 1=low to 6=high	+0.0%
2011	3.12 1=low to 6=high	-1.3%
2012	3.19 1=low to 6=high	+2.0%
2013	3.25 1=low to 6=high	+2.0%
2014	3.1 1=low to 6=high	-4.6%
2015	3.1 1=low to 6=high	+0.0%
2016	3.1 1=low to 6=high	+0.0%
2017	3.1 1=low to 6=high	+0.0%
2018	3.1 1=low to 6=high	+0.0%
2019	3 1=low to 6=high	-3.2%
2020	3 1=low to 6=high	+0.0%
2021	3.12 1=low to 6=high	+4.2%
2022	3.12 1=low to 6=high	+0.0%
2023	3.12 1=low to 6=high	+0.0%
2024	3.12 1=low to 6=high	+0.0%
2025	3.12 1=low to 6=high	+0.0%

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	3.12 1=low to 6=high	3 1=low to 6=high	3.25 1=low to 6=high	5
2010s	3.12 1=low to 6=high	3 1=low to 6=high	3.25 1=low to 6=high	10
2020s	3.1 1=low to 6=high	3 1=low to 6=high	3.12 1=low to 6=high	6

Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)

6 Armenia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Benin 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Côte d'Ivoire 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Djibouti 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Dominica 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Ethiopia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Fiji 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Grenada 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Kenya 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Sri Lanka 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
6 Viet Nam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)

Arms imports 8.83 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 19.2 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0014 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 13.61 % change on previous year (2024)
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 8.83 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 657.44 current USD per person (2024)
Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0492 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 25.48 % change on previous year (2024)
Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 302.41 billion current USD (2024)
Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 338.22 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)

All data for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia quality of public administration rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?: Cpia quality of public administration rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) was 3.12 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?: The highest recorded value was 3.25 1=low to 6=high in 2008.
What is the lowest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?: The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
How does Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for cpia quality of public administration rating?: Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 5th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
Is cpia quality of public administration rating rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?: Over the last ten years it is up 0.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?: The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA quality of public administration rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries). Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-quality-of-public-administration-rating-1-low-to-6-high/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-quality-of-public-administration-rating-1-low-to-6-high/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">CPIA quality of public administration rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit: 1=low to 6=high
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA Quality of Public Administration criterion covers the core administration defined as the civilian central government (and subnational governments, to the extent that their size or policy responsibilities are significant) excluding health and education personnel, and police. The criterion assesses the functioning of the core administration in three areas: (a) managing its own operations; (b) ensuring quality in policy implementation and regulatory management; and (c) coordinating the larger public sector Human Resources Management regime outside the core administration (de-concentrated and arms-length bodies and subsidiary governments).