Statizoid

CPIA structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): CPIA structural policies cluster average was 3.1 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
3.1 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
30th
of 42 groups
All-time high
3.3 1=low to 6=high
in 2009
All-time low
3.06 1=low to 6=high
in 2023
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), 2005–2025

01232005201520252005: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.1 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2025, cpia structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) stood at 3.1 1=low to 6=high.

That represents a change of down 2.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2009 and was at its lowest, 3.06 1=low to 6=high, in 2023.

That places East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) 30th out of 42 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.

CPIA structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.27 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3.21 1=low to 6=high -2.1%
2007 3.21 1=low to 6=high +0.2%
2008 3.24 1=low to 6=high +0.8%
2009 3.3 1=low to 6=high +2.1%
2010 3.3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.26 1=low to 6=high -1.4%
2012 3.23 1=low to 6=high -0.9%
2013 3.21 1=low to 6=high -0.5%
2014 3.22 1=low to 6=high +0.3%
2015 3.19 1=low to 6=high -1.0%
2016 3.19 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3.15 1=low to 6=high -1.1%
2018 3.15 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 3.11 1=low to 6=high -1.5%
2020 3.1 1=low to 6=high -0.4%
2021 3.07 1=low to 6=high -0.8%
2022 3.06 1=low to 6=high -0.4%
2023 3.06 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3.1 1=low to 6=high +1.2%
2025 3.1 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.25 1=low to 6=high 3.21 1=low to 6=high 3.3 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.2 1=low to 6=high 3.11 1=low to 6=high 3.3 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.08 1=low to 6=high 3.06 1=low to 6=high 3.1 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)

  1. 33 Bhutan 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 33 Burkina Faso 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 33 Burundi 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 33 Cameroon 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 33 Guinea 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 33 Guyana 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 33 Honduras 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 33 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 33 Madagascar 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 33 Malawi 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 33 Maldives 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 33 Mauritania 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 33 Nigeria 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 33 Papua New Guinea 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 33 Tanzania, United Republic of 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 33 Vanuatu 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)

All data for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Cpia structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) was 3.1 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia structural policies cluster average recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
The highest recorded value was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
What is the lowest cpia structural policies cluster average recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
The lowest recorded value was 3.06 1=low to 6=high in 2023.
How does East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for cpia structural policies cluster average?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 30th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
Is cpia structural policies cluster average rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Over the last ten years it is down 2.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries). Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-structural-policies-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-structural-policies-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">CPIA structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.