CPIA structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific
East Asia & Pacific: CPIA structural policies cluster average was 3.1 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
East Asia & Pacific recorded 3.1 1=low to 6=high for cpia structural policies cluster average in 2025.
The figure is down 2.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific peaked at 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2009 and was at its lowest, 3.06 1=low to 6=high, in 2023.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 30th of 42 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.27 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.21 1=low to 6=high | -2.1% |
| 2007 | 3.21 1=low to 6=high | +0.2% |
| 2008 | 3.24 1=low to 6=high | +0.8% |
| 2009 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +2.1% |
| 2010 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.26 1=low to 6=high | -1.4% |
| 2012 | 3.23 1=low to 6=high | -0.9% |
| 2013 | 3.21 1=low to 6=high | -0.5% |
| 2014 | 3.22 1=low to 6=high | +0.3% |
| 2015 | 3.19 1=low to 6=high | -1.0% |
| 2016 | 3.19 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | -1.1% |
| 2018 | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.11 1=low to 6=high | -1.5% |
| 2020 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | -0.4% |
| 2021 | 3.07 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
| 2022 | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | -0.4% |
| 2023 | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +1.2% |
| 2025 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.21 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3.11 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.08 1=low to 6=high | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific
- 33 Bhutan 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Burkina Faso 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Burundi 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Cameroon 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Guinea 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Guyana 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Honduras 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Laos 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Madagascar 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Malawi 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Maldives 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Mauritania 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Nigeria 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Papua New Guinea 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Tanzania 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Vanuatu 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for East Asia & Pacific
- Arms imports 4.69 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 1.96 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0001 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 12.28 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 4.69 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 217.12 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0161 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 6.09 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 518.54 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 170.8 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific?
- Cpia structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific was 3.1 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia structural policies cluster average recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The highest recorded value was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
- What is the lowest cpia structural policies cluster average recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.06 1=low to 6=high in 2023.
- How does East Asia & Pacific rank for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 30th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia structural policies cluster average rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.