CPIA structural policies cluster average in Mongolia

Mongolia: CPIA structural policies cluster average was 3.17 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)
3.17 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
down 5.0%
World rank
51st
of 85 countries
All-time high
3.67 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
All-time low
3.17 1=low to 6=high
in 2015
Years of data
15
2005–2019

CPIA structural policies cluster average in Mongolia, 2005–2019

012342005201220192005: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.2 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia structural policies cluster average in Mongolia is 3.17 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 15 years on record.

The figure is down 5.0% on the previous year and down 5.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia structural policies cluster average in Mongolia peaked at 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.17 1=low to 6=high, in 2015.

Mongolia ranks 51st of 85 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.

CPIA structural policies cluster average in Mongolia, year by year

Annual values for CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in Mongolia, 2005 to 2019.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.67 1=low to 6=high
2006 3.67 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 3.67 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3.5 1=low to 6=high -4.5%
2009 3.33 1=low to 6=high -4.8%
2010 3.5 1=low to 6=high +5.0%
2011 3.33 1=low to 6=high -4.8%
2012 3.33 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.33 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3.33 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3.17 1=low to 6=high -5.0%
2016 3.33 1=low to 6=high +5.3%
2017 3.33 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3.33 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 3.17 1=low to 6=high -5.0%

Mongolia compared with similar countries

  • Mongolia's 3.17 1=low to 6=high is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 90% of the median. (21 countries reporting)
  • Mongolia's 3.17 1=low to 6=high is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 3.25 1=low to 6=high, 97% of the median. (16 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.57 1=low to 6=high 3.33 1=low to 6=high 3.67 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.32 1=low to 6=high 3.17 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 10

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 50 Bolivia 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 51 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.17 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 51 Djibouti 3.17 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 51 Ethiopia 3.17 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 51 Gambia 3.17 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 51 Mali 3.17 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 51 Sao Tome and Principe 3.17 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 51 Solomon Islands 3.17 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia structural policies cluster average in Mongolia?
Cpia structural policies cluster average in Mongolia was 3.17 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia structural policies cluster average recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
What is the lowest cpia structural policies cluster average recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 3.17 1=low to 6=high in 2015.
How does Mongolia rank for cpia structural policies cluster average?
Mongolia ranks 51st out of 85 countries with data for 2019.
Is cpia structural policies cluster average rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is down 5.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA structural policies cluster average in Mongolia. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-structural-policies-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-structural-policies-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/mongolia/">CPIA structural policies cluster average in Mongolia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.