CPIA structural policies cluster average in Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea: CPIA structural policies cluster average was 3.33 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA structural policies cluster average in Papua New Guinea, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia structural policies cluster average in Papua New Guinea stood at 3.33 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia structural policies cluster average in Papua New Guinea peaked at 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2014 and was at its lowest, 3.33 1=low to 6=high, in 2021.
Papua New Guinea ranks 33rd of 85 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.43 1=low to 6=high | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.53 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Papua New Guinea
- 33 Bhutan 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Burkina Faso 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Burundi 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Cameroon 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Guinea 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Guyana 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Honduras 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Madagascar 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Malawi 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Maldives 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Mauritania 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Nigeria 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 United Republic of Tanzania 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 33 Vanuatu 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Papua New Guinea
- Arms imports 9.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.8663 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0003 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 600 % change on previous year (1997)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 9.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 19.87 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
- Tax revenue 15.5% (2024)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 8.97 (1994)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 59.4% (2024)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP 44.36 (1994)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia structural policies cluster average in Papua New Guinea?
- Cpia structural policies cluster average in Papua New Guinea was 3.33 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia structural policies cluster average recorded in Papua New Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2014.
- What is the lowest cpia structural policies cluster average recorded in Papua New Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.33 1=low to 6=high in 2021.
- How does Papua New Guinea rank for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 33rd out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia structural policies cluster average rising or falling in Papua New Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Papua New Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.