Expenditure decentralization (ratio of own spending to general) in Lithuania
Lithuania: Expenditure decentralization (ratio of own spending to general) was 0.47 in 2020. ▬ Flat
Expenditure decentralization (ratio of own spending to general) in Lithuania, 2010–2020
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
In 2020, expenditure decentralization (ratio of own spending to general) in Lithuania stood at 0.47.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 7.8% on the previous year and up 9.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, expenditure decentralization (ratio of own spending to general) in Lithuania peaked at 0.4947 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.4295, in 2010.
That places Lithuania 45th out of 65 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.
Expenditure decentralization (ratio of own spending to general) in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 0.4295 | — |
| 2011 | 0.4947 | +15.2% |
| 2012 | 0.4357 | -11.9% |
| 2013 | 0.4622 | +6.1% |
| 2014 | 0.4517 | -2.3% |
| 2015 | 0.4747 | +5.1% |
| 2016 | 0.4609 | -2.9% |
| 2017 | 0.4552 | -1.2% |
| 2018 | 0.44 | -3.3% |
| 2019 | 0.436 | -0.9% |
| 2020 | 0.47 | +7.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4541 | 0.4295 | 0.4947 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 1 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More public sector data for Lithuania
- Arms imports 51.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 17.66 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0006 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -54.05 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 51.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 909.7 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0307 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 21.48 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 2.63 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 1,773 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is expenditure decentralization (ratio of own spending to general) in Lithuania?
- Expenditure decentralization (ratio of own spending to general) in Lithuania was 0.47 in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest expenditure decentralization (ratio of own spending to general) recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 0.4947 in 2011.
- What is the lowest expenditure decentralization (ratio of own spending to general) recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4295 in 2010.
- How does Lithuania rank for expenditure decentralization (ratio of own spending to general)?
- Lithuania ranks 45th out of 65 countries with data for 2020.
- Is expenditure decentralization (ratio of own spending to general) rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Expenditure decentralization (ratio of own spending to general government spending), Percent (Central government). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.