Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency) in Chile
Chile: Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency) was 161.00 billion in 2022. ▲ Rising
Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Chile, 2013–2022
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protection of biodiversity and landscape in Chile is 161.00 billion, measured in 2022. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 15.8% on the previous year and up 130.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protection of biodiversity and landscape in Chile peaked at 161.00 billion in 2022 and was at its lowest, 69.92 billion, in 2013.
That places Chile 3rd out of 92 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the top 10%.
Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency) in Chile, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 69.92 billion | — |
| 2014 | 85.30 billion | +22.0% |
| 2015 | 83.11 billion | -2.6% |
| 2016 | 94.62 billion | +13.8% |
| 2017 | 98.20 billion | +3.8% |
| 2018 | 106.00 billion | +7.9% |
| 2019 | 104.00 billion | -1.9% |
| 2020 | 152.00 billion | +46.2% |
| 2021 | 139.00 billion | -8.6% |
| 2022 | 161.00 billion | +15.8% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 161.00 billion is above the median for high income countries, which is 231.89 million, 694.3× the median. (49 countries reporting)
- Chile's 161.00 billion is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.23 billion, 131.3× the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 91.59 billion | 69.92 billion | 106.00 billion | 7 |
| 2020s | 150.67 billion | 139.00 billion | 161.00 billion | 3 |
Countries ranked near Chile
More public sector data for Chile
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 14.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2025)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.7083 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 55.56 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protection of biodiversity and landscape in Chile?
- Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Chile was 161.00 billion in 2022, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest protection of biodiversity and landscape recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 161.00 billion in 2022.
- What is the lowest protection of biodiversity and landscape recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 69.92 billion in 2013.
- How does Chile rank for protection of biodiversity and landscape?
- Chile ranks 3rd out of 92 countries with data for 2022.
- Is protection of biodiversity and landscape rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 130.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).