Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency) in Ecuador
Ecuador: Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency) was 6.61 million in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Ecuador, 2013–2022
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
In 2022, protection of biodiversity and landscape in Ecuador stood at 6.61 million. That is the lowest value across all 10 years on record.
The figure is down 21.0% on the previous year and down 88.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protection of biodiversity and landscape in Ecuador peaked at 56.64 million in 2013 and was at its lowest, 6.61 million, in 2022.
Ecuador ranks 68th of 92 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency) in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 56.64 million | — |
| 2014 | 31.70 million | -44.0% |
| 2015 | 42.63 million | +34.5% |
| 2016 | 43.44 million | +1.9% |
| 2017 | 45.18 million | +4.0% |
| 2018 | 40.34 million | -10.7% |
| 2019 | 36.74 million | -8.9% |
| 2020 | 12.71 million | -65.4% |
| 2021 | 8.37 million | -34.2% |
| 2022 | 6.61 million | -21.0% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 6.61 million is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 780.67 million, 1% of the median. (29 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 6.61 million is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.23 billion, 1% of the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 42.38 million | 31.70 million | 56.64 million | 7 |
| 2020s | 9.23 million | 6.61 million | 12.71 million | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More public sector data for Ecuador
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 30.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2025)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 1.38 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 257.14 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protection of biodiversity and landscape in Ecuador?
- Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Ecuador was 6.61 million in 2022, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest protection of biodiversity and landscape recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 56.64 million in 2013.
- What is the lowest protection of biodiversity and landscape recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 6.61 million in 2022.
- How does Ecuador rank for protection of biodiversity and landscape?
- Ecuador ranks 68th out of 92 countries with data for 2022.
- Is protection of biodiversity and landscape rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 88.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).