Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Lithuania
Lithuania: Protection of biodiversity and landscape was 22.47 million in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Lithuania, 2000–2021
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
Lithuania recorded 22.47 million for protection of biodiversity and landscape in 2021.
The figure is up 25.8% on the previous year and up 57.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protection of biodiversity and landscape in Lithuania peaked at 24.55 million in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2000.
That places Lithuania 61st out of 92 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 | — |
| 2001 | 0 | — |
| 2002 | 0 | — |
| 2003 | 0 | — |
| 2004 | 5.49 million | — |
| 2005 | 10.03 million | +82.7% |
| 2006 | 14.56 million | +45.2% |
| 2007 | 9.65 million | -33.7% |
| 2008 | 16.49 million | +70.9% |
| 2009 | 14.50 million | -12.1% |
| 2010 | 11.64 million | -19.7% |
| 2011 | 14.24 million | +22.4% |
| 2012 | 19.83 million | +39.2% |
| 2013 | 21.52 million | +8.5% |
| 2014 | 23.68 million | +10.0% |
| 2015 | 14.97 million | -36.8% |
| 2016 | 8.05 million | -46.2% |
| 2017 | 14.68 million | +82.4% |
| 2018 | 24.55 million | +67.2% |
| 2019 | 23.32 million | -5.0% |
| 2020 | 17.87 million | -23.4% |
| 2021 | 22.47 million | +25.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.07 million | 0 | 16.49 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 17.65 million | 8.05 million | 24.55 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 20.17 million | 17.87 million | 22.47 million | 2 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More public sector data for Lithuania
- Arms imports 51.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 17.66 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0006 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -54.05 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 51.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 909.7 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0307 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 21.48 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 2.63 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 1,773 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protection of biodiversity and landscape in Lithuania?
- Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Lithuania was 22.47 million in 2021, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest protection of biodiversity and landscape recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 24.55 million in 2018.
- What is the lowest protection of biodiversity and landscape recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2000.
- How does Lithuania rank for protection of biodiversity and landscape?
- Lithuania ranks 61st out of 92 countries with data for 2021.
- Is protection of biodiversity and landscape rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 57.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 22 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).