Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Zambia
Zambia: Protection of biodiversity and landscape was 0 in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Zambia, 1999–2021
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protection of biodiversity and landscape in Zambia is 0, measured in 2021. That is the lowest value across all 16 years on record.
The figure is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protection of biodiversity and landscape in Zambia peaked at 133.70 million in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1999.
Zambia ranks 80th of 92 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Zambia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 0 | — |
| 2007 | 28.90 million | — |
| 2008 | 12.45 million | -56.9% |
| 2009 | 28.21 million | +126.6% |
| 2010 | 13.23 million | -53.1% |
| 2011 | 39.01 million | +194.8% |
| 2012 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2013 | 0 | — |
| 2014 | 0 | — |
| 2015 | 0 | — |
| 2016 | 100.02 million | — |
| 2017 | 132.93 million | +32.9% |
| 2018 | 16.97 million | -87.2% |
| 2019 | 133.70 million | +687.8% |
| 2020 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 2021 | 0 | — |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000s | 23.19 million | 12.45 million | 28.90 million | 3 |
| 2010s | 43.59 million | 0 | 133.70 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Countries ranked near Zambia
- 77 Republic of Moldova 600,000 compare
- 78 Papua New Guinea 543,690 compare
- 79 Cyprus 500,000 compare
- 80 Bahrain 0
- 80 Belarus 0 compare
- 80 Bhutan 0
- 80 Micronesia, Federated States of 0
- 80 Jordan 0 compare
- 80 Kosovo 0 compare
- 80 Kuwait 0
- 80 Maldives 0
- 80 Naoero 0
- 80 Solomon Islands 0 compare
- 80 Uganda 0 compare
More public sector data for Zambia
- Arms imports 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.0469 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -80 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 16.4 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0138 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate -7.29 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 349.67 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 6.73 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protection of biodiversity and landscape in Zambia?
- Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Zambia was 0 in 2021, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest protection of biodiversity and landscape recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 133.70 million in 2019.
- What is the lowest protection of biodiversity and landscape recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1999.
- How does Zambia rank for protection of biodiversity and landscape?
- Zambia ranks 80th out of 92 countries with data for 2021.
- Is protection of biodiversity and landscape rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).