Use of goods and services, Ratio of this level of government's in Mongolia

Mongolia: Use of goods and services, Ratio of this level of government's was 0.6643 in 2020. ▲ Rising

Latest (2020)
0.6643
Change on year
up 1.9%
World rank
30th
of 79 countries
All-time high
0.9087
in 2007
All-time low
0.3513
in 1993
Years of data
27
1992–2020

Use of goods and services, Ratio of this level of government's in Mongolia, 1992–2020

00.20.40.60.811992200620201992: 0.3981993: 0.3511994: 0.4431995: 0.4561996: 0.421997: 0.471998: 0.4491999: 0.4742000: 0.4622001: 0.5092002: 0.5022003: 0.852006: 0.882007: 0.9092008: 0.8822009: 0.8622010: 0.8642011: 0.872012: 0.8322013: 0.5882014: 0.5642015: 0.5652016: 0.6552017: 0.6172018: 0.6162019: 0.6522020: 0.664

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

In 2020, use of goods and services, ratio of this level of government's in Mongolia stood at 0.6643.

The figure is up 1.9% on the previous year and down 23.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, use of goods and services, ratio of this level of government's in Mongolia peaked at 0.9087 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0.3513, in 1993.

That places Mongolia 30th out of 79 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.

Use of goods and services, Ratio of this level of government's in Mongolia, year by year

Annual values for Use of goods and services, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government) in Mongolia, 1992 to 2020.
Year Value Change
1992 0.3979
1993 0.3513 -11.7%
1994 0.4431 +26.1%
1995 0.4562 +3.0%
1996 0.4201 -7.9%
1997 0.4705 +12.0%
1998 0.4486 -4.7%
1999 0.4741 +5.7%
2000 0.4623 -2.5%
2001 0.5085 +10.0%
2002 0.502 -1.3%
2003 0.8501 +69.3%
2006 0.8802 +3.5%
2007 0.9087 +3.2%
2008 0.882 -2.9%
2009 0.8623 -2.2%
2010 0.8643 +0.2%
2011 0.8698 +0.6%
2012 0.8317 -4.4%
2013 0.5877 -29.3%
2014 0.5639 -4.0%
2015 0.5649 +0.2%
2016 0.6548 +15.9%
2017 0.617 -5.8%
2018 0.6156 -0.2%
2019 0.652 +5.9%
2020 0.6643 +1.9%

Mongolia compared with similar countries

  • Mongolia's 0.6643 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.6549, 1.0× the median. (27 countries reporting)
  • Mongolia's 0.6643 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.7007, 95% of the median. (10 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Use of goods and services, Ratio of this level of government's in Mongolia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2003 +69.3% 0.502 0.8501

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0.4327 0.3513 0.4741 8
2000s 0.732 0.4623 0.9087 8
2010s 0.6822 0.5639 0.8698 10
2020s 0.6643 0.6643 0.6643 1

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 27 Albania 0.6842 compare
  2. 28 Türkiye 0.6764 compare
  3. 29 El Salvador 0.6758 compare
  4. 31 Slovakia 0.6633 compare
  5. 32 Paraguay 0.6549 compare
  6. 33 Greece 0.6432 compare

See the full ranking of 79 places →

More public sector data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is use of goods and services, ratio of this level of government's in Mongolia?
Use of goods and services, ratio of this level of government's in Mongolia was 0.6643 in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest use of goods and services, ratio of this level of government's recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 0.9087 in 2007.
What is the lowest use of goods and services, ratio of this level of government's recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 0.3513 in 1993.
How does Mongolia rank for use of goods and services, ratio of this level of government's?
Mongolia ranks 30th out of 79 countries with data for 2020.
Is use of goods and services, ratio of this level of government's rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is down 23.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Use of goods and services, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Use of goods and services, Ratio of this level of government's in Mongolia. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/use-of-goods-and-services-ratio-of-this-level-of-government-s-expenditure-on-this-item-to/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/use-of-goods-and-services-ratio-of-this-level-of-government-s-expenditure-on-this-item-to/mongolia/">Use of goods and services, Ratio of this level of government's in Mongolia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of goods and services, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
79 places, 1,598 data points, 1973–2020
Last refreshed

The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.