Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent was -0.0484 in 2020. ◆ Volatile
Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent in Kazakhstan, 2005–2020
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
Kazakhstan recorded -0.0484 for vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in 2020. That is the highest value across all 16 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 84.6% on the previous year and up 94.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in Kazakhstan peaked at -0.0484 in 2020 and was at its lowest, -1.24, in 2011.
Kazakhstan ranks 35th of 64 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | -0.3047 | — |
| 2006 | -0.3617 | +18.7% |
| 2007 | -0.3159 | -12.7% |
| 2008 | -0.3599 | +13.9% |
| 2009 | -1.14 | +217.0% |
| 2010 | -0.9252 | -18.9% |
| 2011 | -1.24 | +33.6% |
| 2012 | -0.993 | -19.7% |
| 2013 | -0.9272 | -6.6% |
| 2014 | -0.7707 | -16.9% |
| 2015 | -0.1453 | -81.2% |
| 2016 | -0.1276 | -12.2% |
| 2017 | -0.0511 | -60.0% |
| 2018 | -0.3868 | +657.3% |
| 2019 | -0.3133 | -19.0% |
| 2020 | -0.0484 | -84.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.4966 | -1.14 | -0.3047 | 5 |
| 2010s | -0.5876 | -1.24 | -0.0511 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.0484 | -0.0484 | -0.0484 | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More public sector data for Kazakhstan
- Arms imports 550.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 26.71 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0019 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 340 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 550.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 58.71 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0041 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 3.84 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 1.21 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 46.3 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in Kazakhstan?
- Vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in Kazakhstan was -0.0484 in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest vertical fiscal imbalance, percent recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was -0.0484 in 2020.
- What is the lowest vertical fiscal imbalance, percent recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.24 in 2011.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for vertical fiscal imbalance, percent?
- Kazakhstan ranks 35th out of 64 countries with data for 2020.
- Is vertical fiscal imbalance, percent rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 94.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent (Central government). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.