Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent in Türkiye
Türkiye: Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent was -0.0518 in 2020. ◆ Volatile
Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent in Türkiye, 2008–2020
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
The most recent figure for vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in Türkiye is -0.0518, measured in 2020.
That represents a change of up 40.2% on the previous year and up 39.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in Türkiye peaked at 0.0177 in 2009 and was at its lowest, -0.2299, in 2013.
Türkiye ranks 36th of 64 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent in Türkiye, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | -0.0455 | — |
| 2009 | 0.0177 | -138.8% |
| 2010 | -0.0852 | -582.0% |
| 2011 | -0.2122 | +149.0% |
| 2012 | -0.2102 | -0.9% |
| 2013 | -0.2299 | +9.4% |
| 2014 | -0.2095 | -8.9% |
| 2015 | -0.2224 | +6.1% |
| 2016 | -0.1348 | -39.4% |
| 2017 | -0.0962 | -28.6% |
| 2018 | -0.0817 | -15.0% |
| 2019 | -0.0865 | +5.9% |
| 2020 | -0.0518 | -40.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.0139 | -0.0455 | 0.0177 | 2 |
| 2010s | -0.1569 | -0.2299 | -0.0817 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.0518 | -0.0518 | -0.0518 | 1 |
Countries ranked near Türkiye
- 33 Iran, Islamic Republic of -0.0212
- 34 Australia -0.0477 compare
- 35 Kazakhstan -0.0484 compare
- 37 North Macedonia -0.0623 compare
- 38 Albania -0.0785 compare
- 39 Lithuania -0.1062 compare
More public sector data for Türkiye
- Arms imports 381.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 4.46 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0003 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -43.89 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 381.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 292.08 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0184 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 27.59 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 24.98 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 882.24 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in Türkiye?
- Vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in Türkiye was -0.0518 in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest vertical fiscal imbalance, percent recorded in Türkiye?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0177 in 2009.
- What is the lowest vertical fiscal imbalance, percent recorded in Türkiye?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.2299 in 2013.
- How does Türkiye rank for vertical fiscal imbalance, percent?
- Türkiye ranks 36th out of 64 countries with data for 2020.
- Is vertical fiscal imbalance, percent rising or falling in Türkiye?
- Over the last ten years it is up 39.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Türkiye data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent (Central government). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.