Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent in Thailand
Thailand: Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent was 0.1175 in 2020. ◆ Volatile
Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent in Thailand, 2002–2020
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
In 2020, vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in Thailand stood at 0.1175.
The figure is up 219.6% on the previous year and up 1,603.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in Thailand peaked at 0.2665 in 2002 and was at its lowest, -0.2565, in 2005.
Thailand ranks 24th of 64 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent in Thailand, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 0.2665 | — |
| 2003 | -0.1526 | -157.3% |
| 2004 | -0.1292 | -15.3% |
| 2005 | -0.2565 | +98.5% |
| 2006 | -0.2322 | -9.5% |
| 2007 | -0.1511 | -34.9% |
| 2008 | -0.1699 | +12.4% |
| 2009 | 0.0595 | -135.0% |
| 2010 | -0.0078 | -113.1% |
| 2011 | -0.0717 | +817.2% |
| 2012 | -0.0437 | -39.0% |
| 2013 | -0.1331 | +204.2% |
| 2014 | -0.0593 | -55.4% |
| 2015 | -0.1057 | +78.2% |
| 2016 | -0.1232 | +16.6% |
| 2017 | -0.0495 | -59.8% |
| 2018 | -0.0673 | +35.9% |
| 2019 | -0.0982 | +46.0% |
| 2020 | 0.1175 | -219.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.0957 | -0.2565 | 0.2665 | 8 |
| 2010s | -0.0759 | -0.1331 | -0.0078 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1175 | 0.1175 | 0.1175 | 1 |
Countries ranked near Thailand
More public sector data for Thailand
- Arms imports 73.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 1.02 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0001 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -74.91 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 73.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 77.06 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0104 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate -3.89 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 5.52 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 569.59 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in Thailand?
- Vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in Thailand was 0.1175 in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest vertical fiscal imbalance, percent recorded in Thailand?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2665 in 2002.
- What is the lowest vertical fiscal imbalance, percent recorded in Thailand?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.2565 in 2005.
- How does Thailand rank for vertical fiscal imbalance, percent?
- Thailand ranks 24th out of 64 countries with data for 2020.
- Is vertical fiscal imbalance, percent rising or falling in Thailand?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,603.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Thailand data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent (Central government). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.