Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Mali: CPIA economic management cluster average
CPIA economic management cluster average over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 3.83 1=low to 6=high against 3.67 1=low to 6=high in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, a difference of 0.16 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mali ahead.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 24th and Mali ranks 21st of 84 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bolivia, Plurinational State of averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.14 1=low to 6=high | 4.33 1=low to 6=high | 0.1867 1=low to 6=high | Mali |
| 2010s | 3.97 1=low to 6=high | 3.92 1=low to 6=high | 0.0556 1=low to 6=high | Bolivia, Plurinational State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Mali?
- Mali, at 3.83 1=low to 6=high against 3.67 1=low to 6=high in Bolivia, Plurinational State of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Mali?
- 0.16 1=low to 6=high, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Mali?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Mali rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 24th and Mali ranks 21st of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.