CPIA economic management cluster average in Bolivia

Bolivia: CPIA economic management cluster average was 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2015. ▼ Falling

Latest (2015)
3.67 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
down 8.3%
World rank
25th
of 85 countries
All-time high
4.2 1=low to 6=high
in 2008
All-time low
3.67 1=low to 6=high
in 2015
Years of data
11
2005–2015

CPIA economic management cluster average in Bolivia, 2005–2015

012342005201020152005: 4 1=low to 6=high2006: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2007: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2008: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2009: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2010: 4.2 1=low to 6=high2011: 4 1=low to 6=high2012: 4 1=low to 6=high2013: 4 1=low to 6=high2014: 4 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.7 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia economic management cluster average in Bolivia is 3.67 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2015. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.

That represents a change of down 8.3% on the previous year and down 8.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia economic management cluster average in Bolivia peaked at 4.2 1=low to 6=high in 2008 and was at its lowest, 3.67 1=low to 6=high, in 2015.

That places Bolivia 25th out of 85 countries with data for 2015, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.

CPIA economic management cluster average in Bolivia, year by year

Annual values for CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in Bolivia, 2005 to 2015.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 4 1=low to 6=high
2006 4.17 1=low to 6=high +4.2%
2007 4.17 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 4.2 1=low to 6=high +0.8%
2009 4.17 1=low to 6=high -0.8%
2010 4.17 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 4 1=low to 6=high -4.0%
2012 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3.67 1=low to 6=high -8.3%

Bolivia compared with similar countries

  • Bolivia's 3.67 1=low to 6=high is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3.33 1=low to 6=high, 1.1× the median. (39 countries reporting)
  • Bolivia's 3.67 1=low to 6=high is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 3.67 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (9 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 4.14 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4.2 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.97 1=low to 6=high 3.67 1=low to 6=high 4.17 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Bolivia

  1. 22 Kenya 3.83 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 22 Mali 3.83 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 22 Nicaragua 3.83 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 25 Vietnam 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 27 Bhutan 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 27 Cameroon 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 27 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 27 Dominica 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 27 Guinea 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 27 Madagascar 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 27 Nigeria 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 27 Saint Lucia 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 27 Uganda 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Bolivia

All data for Bolivia →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia economic management cluster average in Bolivia?
Cpia economic management cluster average in Bolivia was 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2015, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in Bolivia?
The highest recorded value was 4.2 1=low to 6=high in 2008.
What is the lowest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in Bolivia?
The lowest recorded value was 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2015.
How does Bolivia rank for cpia economic management cluster average?
Bolivia ranks 25th out of 85 countries with data for 2015.
Is cpia economic management cluster average rising or falling in Bolivia?
Over the last ten years it is down 8.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Bolivia data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA economic management cluster average in Bolivia. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-economic-management-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/bolivia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-economic-management-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/bolivia/">CPIA economic management cluster average in Bolivia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.