Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): CPIA economic management cluster average

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
3.67 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
3.04 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
27th
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
30th

CPIA economic management cluster average over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
01234200520152025

How they compare

Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.04 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.63 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Congo, Democratic Republic of the's figure about 1.2 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 27th and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 30th of 85 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the averaged higher in 1 and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
2000s 3.17 1=low to 6=high 3.57 1=low to 6=high 0.3971 1=low to 6=high East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
2010s 3.23 1=low to 6=high 3.32 1=low to 6=high 0.0854 1=low to 6=high East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
2020s 3.58 1=low to 6=high 3.06 1=low to 6=high 0.5258 1=low to 6=high Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.04 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
0.63 1=low to 6=high, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 27th and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): CPIA economic management cluster average. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-economic-management-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/congo-dem-rep/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-economic-management-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/congo-dem-rep/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): CPIA economic management cluster average</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.