CPIA economic management cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): CPIA economic management cluster average was 3.04 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA economic management cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia economic management cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) stood at 3.04 1=low to 6=high.
That represents a change of up 1.2% on the previous year and down 7.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia economic management cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 3.65 1=low to 6=high in 2009 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2024.
That places East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) 30th out of 42 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA economic management cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.59 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.56 1=low to 6=high | -0.9% |
| 2007 | 3.52 1=low to 6=high | -1.2% |
| 2008 | 3.54 1=low to 6=high | +0.6% |
| 2009 | 3.65 1=low to 6=high | +3.3% |
| 2010 | 3.62 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
| 2011 | 3.51 1=low to 6=high | -3.0% |
| 2012 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | -3.8% |
| 2013 | 3.34 1=low to 6=high | -1.1% |
| 2014 | 3.31 1=low to 6=high | -1.0% |
| 2015 | 3.27 1=low to 6=high | -1.3% |
| 2016 | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | -2.7% |
| 2017 | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.7% |
| 2019 | 3.19 1=low to 6=high | -0.4% |
| 2020 | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | -0.7% |
| 2021 | 3.08 1=low to 6=high | -2.6% |
| 2022 | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
| 2023 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -1.9% |
| 2024 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.04 1=low to 6=high | +1.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.57 1=low to 6=high | 3.52 1=low to 6=high | 3.65 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.32 1=low to 6=high | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | 3.62 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 27 Bhutan 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Cameroon 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Dominica 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Guinea 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Madagascar 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Nigeria 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Saint Lucia 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Uganda 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Arms imports 872.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.4124 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -41.87 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 872.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 163.99 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0156 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 6.25 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 346.78 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 94.45 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia economic management cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Cpia economic management cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) was 3.04 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 3.65 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
- What is the lowest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2024.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for cpia economic management cluster average?
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 30th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia economic management cluster average rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 7.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.