High income vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high) over time
- High income
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in High income, a difference of 0.5 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)'s figure about 1.1 times High income's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was High income ahead.
High income ranks 4th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 2nd of 42 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, High income averaged higher in 2 and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 0.1667 1=low to 6=high | High income |
| 2010s | 3.63 1=low to 6=high | 3.57 1=low to 6=high | 0.0667 1=low to 6=high | High income |
| 2020s | 3.58 1=low to 6=high | 4.14 1=low to 6=high | 0.5556 1=low to 6=high | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, High income or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in High income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between High income and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0.5 1=low to 6=high, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do High income and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
- High income ranks 4th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 2nd of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.