CPIA economic management cluster average in High income

High income: CPIA economic management cluster average was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
4 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
up 14.3%
Rank
4th
of 42 groups
All-time high
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
All-time low
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA economic management cluster average in High income, 2005–2025

012342005201520252005: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2025: 4 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2025, cpia economic management cluster average in High income stood at 4 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

The figure is up 14.3% on the previous year and up 9.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia economic management cluster average in High income peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

High income ranks 4th of 42 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.

CPIA economic management cluster average in High income, year by year

Annual values for CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in High income, 2005 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.5 1=low to 6=high
2006 3.67 1=low to 6=high +4.8%
2007 3.67 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3.7 1=low to 6=high +0.9%
2009 3.5 1=low to 6=high -5.4%
2010 3.67 1=low to 6=high +4.8%
2011 3.67 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3.67 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.67 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3.67 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3.67 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 3.67 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3.67 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3.5 1=low to 6=high -4.5%
2019 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 4 1=low to 6=high +14.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.61 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.7 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.63 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.67 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.58 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near High income

  1. 1 Georgia 4.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 2 Armenia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 2 Kosovo 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 4 Azerbaijan 4.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 5 Côte d'Ivoire 4.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 5 Samoa 4.33 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 7 Mauritania 4.17 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 7 Rwanda 4.17 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 7 Tanzania, United Republic of 4.17 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 7 Uzbekistan 4.17 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for High income

All data for High income →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia economic management cluster average in High income?
Cpia economic management cluster average in High income was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in High income?
The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
What is the lowest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in High income?
The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does High income rank for cpia economic management cluster average?
High income ranks 4th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
Is cpia economic management cluster average rising or falling in High income?
Over the last ten years it is up 9.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this High income data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA economic management cluster average in High income. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-economic-management-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-economic-management-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/high-income/">CPIA economic management cluster average in High income</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.