Afghanistan vs Myanmar: CPIA macroeconomic management rating
CPIA macroeconomic management rating over time
- Afghanistan
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 1.5 1=low to 6=high against 1 1=low to 6=high in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.5 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.5 times Afghanistan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 85th and Myanmar ranks 82nd of 85 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2020s | 1.6 1=low to 6=high | 1.9 1=low to 6=high | 0.3 1=low to 6=high | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia macroeconomic management rating, Afghanistan or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 1.5 1=low to 6=high against 1 1=low to 6=high in Afghanistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia macroeconomic management rating between Afghanistan and Myanmar?
- 0.5 1=low to 6=high, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Myanmar?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Afghanistan and Myanmar rank globally for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- Afghanistan ranks 85th and Myanmar ranks 82nd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.