CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Myanmar
Myanmar: CPIA macroeconomic management rating was 1.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Myanmar, 2013–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia macroeconomic management rating in Myanmar is 1.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.
That represents a change of down 57.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia macroeconomic management rating in Myanmar peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013 and was at its lowest, 1.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2022.
Myanmar ranks 81st of 84 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Myanmar, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2014 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2 1=low to 6=high | -42.9% |
| 2022 | 1.5 1=low to 6=high | -25.0% |
| 2023 | 1.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 1.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 7 |
| 2020s | 1.92 1=low to 6=high | 1.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Myanmar
- 81 Eritrea 1.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 81 South Sudan 1.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 84 Afghanistan 1 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Myanmar
- Arms imports 222.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 4.07 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.003 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 73.44 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 222.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 91.95 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0677 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 100.97 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 5.01 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 196.12 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia macroeconomic management rating in Myanmar?
- Cpia macroeconomic management rating in Myanmar was 1.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Myanmar?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
- What is the lowest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Myanmar?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.5 1=low to 6=high in 2022.
- How does Myanmar rank for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- Myanmar ranks 81st out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia macroeconomic management rating rising or falling in Myanmar?
- Over the last ten years it is down 57.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Myanmar data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.