Angola vs Comoros: CPIA macroeconomic management rating
CPIA macroeconomic management rating over time
- Angola
- Comoros
How they compare
Angola currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Comoros, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Comoros ahead.
Angola ranks 56th and Comoros ranks 56th of 84 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 2.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.3 1=low to 6=high | Angola |
| 2010s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia macroeconomic management rating, Angola or Comoros?
- Angola, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Comoros as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cpia macroeconomic management rating between Angola and Comoros?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Comoros?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Angola and Comoros rank globally for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- Angola ranks 56th and Comoros ranks 56th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.