CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Angola
Angola: CPIA macroeconomic management rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▬ Flat
CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Angola, 2005–2013
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia macroeconomic management rating in Angola is 3 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia macroeconomic management rating in Angola peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Angola ranks 56th of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Angola, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 4 |
Countries ranked near Angola
- 56 Bangladesh 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 56 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 56 Burundi 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 56 Comoros 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 56 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 56 Fiji 3 1=low to 6=high
- 56 Kiribati 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 56 Marshall Islands 3 1=low to 6=high
- 56 Micronesia, Federated States of 3 1=low to 6=high
- 56 Mozambique 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 56 Nepal 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 56 Sao Tome and Principe 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 56 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 56 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 56 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 56 Timor-Leste 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 56 Tuvalu 3 1=low to 6=high
More public sector data for Angola
- Arms imports 16.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.4223 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 6.67 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 16.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 24.34 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0089 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate -26.11 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 922.05 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 12.03 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia macroeconomic management rating in Angola?
- Cpia macroeconomic management rating in Angola was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Angola?
- The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Angola?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Angola rank for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- Angola ranks 56th out of 84 countries with data for 2013.
- Is cpia macroeconomic management rating rising or falling in Angola?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Angola data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.