Bolivia vs East Timor: CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Bolivia
- East Timor
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in East Timor, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 57th and East Timor ranks 57th of 85 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 2.62 1=low to 6=high | 1.38 1=low to 6=high | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | 0.0833 1=low to 6=high | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia macroeconomic management rating, Bolivia or East Timor?
- Bolivia, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in East Timor as of 2015.
- What is the difference in cpia macroeconomic management rating between Bolivia and East Timor?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and East Timor?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2015.
- How do Bolivia and East Timor rank globally for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- Bolivia ranks 57th and East Timor ranks 57th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.