CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) in East Timor

East Timor: CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
3 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
57th
of 85 countries
All-time high
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2011
All-time low
2.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
Years of data
20
2006–2025

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in East Timor, 2006–2025

012342006201520252006: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2007: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2008: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2009: 3 1=low to 6=high2010: 3 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2017: 3 1=low to 6=high2018: 3 1=low to 6=high2019: 3 1=low to 6=high2020: 3 1=low to 6=high2021: 3 1=low to 6=high2022: 3 1=low to 6=high2023: 3 1=low to 6=high2024: 3 1=low to 6=high2025: 3 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

East Timor recorded 3 1=low to 6=high for cpia macroeconomic management rating in 2025.

The figure is down 14.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia macroeconomic management rating in East Timor peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.

That places East Timor 57th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 20 years of available data.

CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) in East Timor, year by year

Annual values for CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) in East Timor, 2006 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2006 2.5 1=low to 6=high —
2007 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3 1=low to 6=high +20.0%
2010 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.5 1=low to 6=high +16.7%
2012 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3 1=low to 6=high -14.3%
2018 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

East Timor compared with similar countries

  • East Timor's 3 1=low to 6=high is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 86% of the median. (39 countries reporting)
  • East Timor's 3 1=low to 6=high is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (16 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.62 1=low to 6=high 2.5 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 4
2010s 3.3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near East Timor

  1. 57 Angola 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 57 Bangladesh 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 57 Bolivia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 57 Burundi 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 57 Comoros 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 57 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 57 Fiji 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 57 Kiribati 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 57 Marshall Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 57 Micronesia (country) 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 57 Mozambique 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 57 Nepal 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 57 Sao Tome and Principe 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 57 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 57 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 57 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 57 Tuvalu 3 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for East Timor

All data for East Timor →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia macroeconomic management rating in East Timor?
Cpia macroeconomic management rating in East Timor was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in East Timor?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
What is the lowest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in East Timor?
The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
How does East Timor rank for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
East Timor ranks 57th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia macroeconomic management rating rising or falling in East Timor?
Over the last ten years it is down 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this East Timor data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in East Timor. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-macroeconomic-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-macroeconomic-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/timor-leste/">CPIA macroeconomic management rating in East Timor</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.