Cambodia vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating over time
- Cambodia
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
Cambodia ranks 17th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 17th of 85 countries.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2010s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2020s | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.1667 1=low to 6=high | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating, Cambodia or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Cambodia, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating between Cambodia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Cambodia ranks 17th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 17th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.