CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2009–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) stood at 3.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
That represents a change of up 16.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2019 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2011.
That places Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 17th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2010 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2013 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2020 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 1 |
| 2010s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- 17 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Cameroon 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Dominica 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Maldives 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Mali 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Mozambique 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Nepal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Niger 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Samoa 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Sao Tome and Principe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Sierra Leone 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Arms imports 14.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Military expenditure 165.56 million current USD (2024)
- Military expenditure 1.5% (2024)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score 60 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Intentional homicides 1.89 per 100,000 people (2021)
- Military expenditure 153.05 million current LCU (2024)
- Military expenditure 4.8% (2024)
- Primary government expenditures as a proportion of original approved 90.0% (2022)
- Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with 1,100 number of cases (2023)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score 45.91 scale 0-100 (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2019.
- What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- How does Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 17th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.