Azerbaijan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: CPIA structural policies cluster average
CPIA structural policies cluster average over time
- Azerbaijan
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.17 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 23rd and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 22nd of 85 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.63 1=low to 6=high | 3.87 1=low to 6=high | 0.24 1=low to 6=high | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Azerbaijan or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Azerbaijan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0.17 1=low to 6=high, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
- How do Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- Azerbaijan ranks 23rd and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 22nd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.