CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina: CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) was 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▬ Flat
CPIA structural policies cluster average in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2005–2013
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2013, cpia structural policies cluster average in Bosnia and Herzegovina stood at 3.67 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 9 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.3% on the previous year and down 4.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia structural policies cluster average in Bosnia and Herzegovina peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2008 and was at its lowest, 3.67 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 22nd of 85 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.83 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | -4.3% |
| 2007 | 3.83 1=low to 6=high | +4.5% |
| 2008 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +4.3% |
| 2009 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.83 1=low to 6=high | -4.2% |
| 2012 | 3.83 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | -4.3% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina compared with similar countries
- Bosnia and Herzegovina's 3.67 1=low to 6=high is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Bosnia and Herzegovina's 3.67 1=low to 6=high is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 3.67 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (9 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.87 1=low to 6=high | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.83 1=low to 6=high | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 23 Azerbaijan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Grenada 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Sri Lanka 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Vietnam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2025)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 3.7 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0005 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 12.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia structural policies cluster average in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Cpia structural policies cluster average in Bosnia and Herzegovina was 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia structural policies cluster average recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2008.
- What is the lowest cpia structural policies cluster average recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- How does Bosnia and Herzegovina rank for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 22nd out of 85 countries with data for 2013.
- Is cpia structural policies cluster average rising or falling in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Bosnia and Herzegovina data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.