Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Lesotho: CPIA structural policies cluster average
CPIA structural policies cluster average over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Lesotho
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Lesotho, a difference of 0.17 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 22nd and Lesotho ranks 23rd of 85 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.87 1=low to 6=high | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 0.54 1=low to 6=high | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 3.83 1=low to 6=high | 3.29 1=low to 6=high | 0.5417 1=low to 6=high | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Lesotho?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Lesotho as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Lesotho?
- 0.17 1=low to 6=high, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Lesotho?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Lesotho rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 22nd and Lesotho ranks 23rd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.