Sri Lanka vs Vietnam: CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Sri Lanka
- Vietnam
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Vietnam, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 23rd and Vietnam ranks 23rd of 85 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.77 1=low to 6=high | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 0.44 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 3.92 1=low to 6=high | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia structural policies cluster average, Sri Lanka or Vietnam?
- Sri Lanka, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Vietnam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia structural policies cluster average between Sri Lanka and Vietnam?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Vietnam?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Sri Lanka and Vietnam rank globally for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- Sri Lanka ranks 23rd and Vietnam ranks 23rd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.