CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in Vietnam

Vietnam: CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2015. ▲ Rising

Latest (2015)
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
23rd
of 85 countries
All-time high
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2013
All-time low
3.3 1=low to 6=high
in 2008
Years of data
11
2005–2015

CPIA structural policies cluster average in Vietnam, 2005–2015

012342005201020152005: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2015, cpia structural policies cluster average in Vietnam stood at 3.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 5.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia structural policies cluster average in Vietnam peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013 and was at its lowest, 3.3 1=low to 6=high, in 2008.

Vietnam ranks 23rd of 85 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in Vietnam, year by year

Annual values for CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in Vietnam, 2005 to 2015.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.33 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3.33 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 3.33 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3.3 1=low to 6=high -1.0%
2009 3.33 1=low to 6=high +1.0%
2010 3.33 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.33 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3.33 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.5 1=low to 6=high +5.0%
2014 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Vietnam compared with similar countries

  • Vietnam's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (21 countries reporting)
  • Vietnam's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 3.25 1=low to 6=high, 1.1× the median. (16 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.33 1=low to 6=high 3.3 1=low to 6=high 3.33 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.42 1=low to 6=high 3.33 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Vietnam

  1. 22 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.67 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 23 Azerbaijan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 23 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 23 Grenada 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 23 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 23 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 23 Sri Lanka 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 23 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 23 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 23 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 23 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Vietnam

All data for Vietnam →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia structural policies cluster average in Vietnam?
Cpia structural policies cluster average in Vietnam was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2015, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia structural policies cluster average recorded in Vietnam?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
What is the lowest cpia structural policies cluster average recorded in Vietnam?
The lowest recorded value was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2008.
How does Vietnam rank for cpia structural policies cluster average?
Vietnam ranks 23rd out of 85 countries with data for 2015.
Is cpia structural policies cluster average rising or falling in Vietnam?
Over the last ten years it is up 5.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Vietnam data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA structural policies cluster average in Vietnam. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-structural-policies-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-structural-policies-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/viet-nam/">CPIA structural policies cluster average in Vietnam</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.