Kiribati vs Malta: Subsidies and other transfers
Subsidies and other transfers over time
- Kiribati
- Malta
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 35.5% against 35.2% in Malta, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Malta ahead.
Kiribati ranks 81st and Malta ranks 83rd of 152 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17.6% | 36.0% | 18.4% | Malta |
| 2020s | 34.2% | 37.9% | 3.7% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher subsidies and other transfers, Kiribati or Malta?
- Kiribati, at 35.5% against 35.2% in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in subsidies and other transfers between Kiribati and Malta?
- 0.3%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Malta?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Malta rank globally for subsidies and other transfers?
- Kiribati ranks 81st and Malta ranks 83rd of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Subsidies and other transfers (% of expense). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Subsidies are current unrequited payments that government units, including nonresident government units, make to enterprises on the basis of the levels of their production activities or the quantities or values of the goods or services that they produce, sell, export or import. This indicator is expressed as percentage of total expenses which is any decrease in net worth resulting from a transaction.