CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high) in Moldova
Moldova: CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high) was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▬ Flat
CPIA building human resources rating in Moldova, 2005–2019
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia building human resources rating in Moldova is 4 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia building human resources rating in Moldova peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 4 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Moldova 17th out of 85 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high) in Moldova, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 4 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Moldova compared with similar countries
- Moldova's 4 1=low to 6=high is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 4 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Moldova's 4 1=low to 6=high is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 4 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (9 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
Countries ranked near Moldova
- 17 Armenia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Azerbaijan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Bangladesh 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Burundi 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Cameroon 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Chad 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Djibouti 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Ethiopia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Gambia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Ghana 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 India 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Kyrgyzstan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Malawi 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Maldives 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Mongolia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Senegal 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Sierra Leone 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Tanzania 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Uzbekistan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Vietnam 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Zimbabwe 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Moldova
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 5.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2025)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 46.09 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0061 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 17.34 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia building human resources rating in Moldova?
- Cpia building human resources rating in Moldova was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Moldova?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Moldova?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Moldova rank for cpia building human resources rating?
- Moldova ranks 17th out of 85 countries with data for 2019.
- Is cpia building human resources rating rising or falling in Moldova?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Moldova data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.