CPIA building human resources rating in Viet Nam
Viet Nam: CPIA building human resources rating was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2015. ▬ Flat
CPIA building human resources rating in Viet Nam, 2005–2015
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2015, cpia building human resources rating in Viet Nam stood at 4 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia building human resources rating in Viet Nam peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 4 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Viet Nam ranks 17th of 84 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
CPIA building human resources rating in Viet Nam, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 4 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Viet Nam
- 17 Armenia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Azerbaijan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Bangladesh 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Burundi 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Cameroon 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Chad 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Djibouti 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Ethiopia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Gambia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Ghana 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 India 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Kyrgyzstan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Malawi 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Maldives 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Republic of Moldova 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Mongolia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Senegal 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Sierra Leone 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Tanzania, United Republic of 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Uzbekistan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Zimbabwe 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Viet Nam
- Arms imports 58.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.5743 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0001 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 5.45 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 58.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 57.15 current USD per person (2018)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0177 current USD per US$ of GDP (2018)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 8.4 % change on previous year (2018)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 5.50 billion current USD (2018)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 175.48 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia building human resources rating in Viet Nam?
- Cpia building human resources rating in Viet Nam was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2015, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Viet Nam?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Viet Nam?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Viet Nam rank for cpia building human resources rating?
- Viet Nam ranks 17th out of 84 countries with data for 2015.
- Is cpia building human resources rating rising or falling in Viet Nam?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Viet Nam data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.