CPIA business regulatory environment rating in Post-demographic dividend
Post-demographic dividend: CPIA business regulatory environment rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▬ Flat
CPIA business regulatory environment rating in Post-demographic dividend, 2005–2013
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia business regulatory environment rating in Post-demographic dividend is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2013. That is the lowest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia business regulatory environment rating in Post-demographic dividend peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2007 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Post-demographic dividend ranks 2nd of 42 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
CPIA business regulatory environment rating in Post-demographic dividend, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +14.3% |
| 2008 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -12.5% |
| 2012 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.62 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 |
Countries ranked near Post-demographic dividend
- 1 Georgia 5.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Armenia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Rwanda 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Azerbaijan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Kenya 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Kosovo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Republic of Moldova 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Post-demographic dividend
- Arms imports 15.20 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 13.47 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 33.39 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 15.20 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 1,472 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0261 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 9.78 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 1.66 trillion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 365.72 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia business regulatory environment rating in Post-demographic dividend?
- Cpia business regulatory environment rating in Post-demographic dividend was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia business regulatory environment rating recorded in Post-demographic dividend?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2007.
- What is the lowest cpia business regulatory environment rating recorded in Post-demographic dividend?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Post-demographic dividend rank for cpia business regulatory environment rating?
- Post-demographic dividend ranks 2nd out of 42 groups with data for 2013.
- Is cpia business regulatory environment rating rising or falling in Post-demographic dividend?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Post-demographic dividend data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA business regulatory environment rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Business Regulatory Environment criterion assesses the extent to which the legal, regulatory, and policy environment helps or hinders private business in investing, creating jobs, and becoming more productive. The emphasis is on direct regulations of business activity and regulation of goods and factor markets. Three sub-components are measured: (a) regulations affecting entry, exit, and competition; (b) regulations of ongoing business operations; and (c) regulations of factor markets (labor and land).