CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Kiribati
Kiribati: CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Kiribati, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Kiribati stood at 3.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Kiribati peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Kiribati 22nd out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Kiribati, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2013 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2015 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kiribati
- 22 Armenia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Azerbaijan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Fiji 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Guyana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Kyrgyzstan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Madagascar 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Malawi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Maldives 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Republic of Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Papua New Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Sri Lanka 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Tanzania, United Republic of 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Zambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Kiribati
- Tax revenue 17.5% (2023)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 7.4% (2023)
- Taxes on goods and services 11.8% (2023)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 7.1% (2023)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) -1.4% (2023)
- Interest payments 0.7% (2023)
- Grants and other revenue 80.4% (2023)
- Interest payments 0.8% (2023)
- Compensation of employees 31.4% (2023)
- Goods and services expense 29.4% (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Kiribati?
- Cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Kiribati was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating recorded in Kiribati?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- What is the lowest cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating recorded in Kiribati?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Kiribati rank for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating?
- Kiribati ranks 22nd out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating rising or falling in Kiribati?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kiribati data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization criterion assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization, not only the tax structure as it exists on paper, but revenue from all sources as they are collected. Separate sub-ratings are provided for (a) tax policy and (b) tax administration.