CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high) in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high) was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Kyrgyzstan, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Kyrgyzstan stood at 3.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Kyrgyzstan 22nd out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high) in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2007 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (39 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 4 1=low to 6=high, 88% of the median. (9 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 22 Armenia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Azerbaijan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Fiji 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Guyana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Kiribati 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Madagascar 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Malawi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Maldives 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Papua New Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Sri Lanka 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Tanzania 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Zambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Kyrgyzstan
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 54.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 7.47 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0035 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 278.57 % change on previous year (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Kyrgyzstan?
- Cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Kyrgyzstan was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- What is the lowest cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 22nd out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization criterion assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization, not only the tax structure as it exists on paper, but revenue from all sources as they are collected. Separate sub-ratings are provided for (a) tax policy and (b) tax administration.