CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high) in Madagascar
Madagascar: CPIA financial sector rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA financial sector rating in Madagascar, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia financial sector rating in Madagascar stood at 3 1=low to 6=high.
The figure is up 20.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia financial sector rating in Madagascar peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2012.
That places Madagascar 28th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA financial sector rating in Madagascar, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2009 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2013 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2018 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Madagascar compared with similar countries
- Madagascar's 3 1=low to 6=high is above the median for low income countries, which is 2.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.2× the median. (23 countries reporting)
- Madagascar's 3 1=low to 6=high is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (40 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.75 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Madagascar
- 28 Azerbaijan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Benin 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Bhutan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Bolivia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Burkina Faso 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Burundi 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Cambodia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Cameroon 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Ethiopia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Lesotho 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Liberia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Maldives 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Mali 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Nigeria 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Papua New Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Togo 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Uzbekistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Vanuatu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Vietnam 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Zimbabwe 3 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Madagascar
- Democracy, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Democracy 0 (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected 0 (2025)
- Elected parliament 0 (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia financial sector rating in Madagascar?
- Cpia financial sector rating in Madagascar was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Madagascar?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Madagascar?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2012.
- How does Madagascar rank for cpia financial sector rating?
- Madagascar ranks 28th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia financial sector rating rising or falling in Madagascar?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Madagascar data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The financial sector criterion assesses the policies and regulations that affect financial sector development. Three dimensions are covered: (a) financial stability; (b) the sector’s efficiency, depth, and resource mobilization strength; and (c) access to financial services.