CPIA financial sector rating in Nigeria
Nigeria: CPIA financial sector rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA financial sector rating in Nigeria, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Nigeria recorded 3 1=low to 6=high for cpia financial sector rating in 2025.
The figure is up 20.0% on the previous year and down 14.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia financial sector rating in Nigeria peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2007 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2017.
That places Nigeria 27th out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA financial sector rating in Nigeria, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2008 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2017 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2018 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.58 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Nigeria
- 27 Azerbaijan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Benin 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Bhutan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Burkina Faso 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Burundi 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Cambodia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Cameroon 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Ethiopia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Lesotho 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Liberia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Madagascar 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Maldives 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Mali 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Papua New Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Togo 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Uzbekistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Vanuatu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Viet Nam 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 27 Zimbabwe 3 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Nigeria
- Arms imports 67.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.2879 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0003 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -27.96 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 67.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 4.87 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0045 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate -63.46 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 1.13 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 102.11 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia financial sector rating in Nigeria?
- Cpia financial sector rating in Nigeria was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Nigeria?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2007.
- What is the lowest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Nigeria?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2017.
- How does Nigeria rank for cpia financial sector rating?
- Nigeria ranks 27th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia financial sector rating rising or falling in Nigeria?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Nigeria data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The financial sector criterion assesses the policies and regulations that affect financial sector development. Three dimensions are covered: (a) financial stability; (b) the sector’s efficiency, depth, and resource mobilization strength; and (c) access to financial services.