Statizoid

CPIA financial sector rating in Papua New Guinea

Papua New Guinea: CPIA financial sector rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
3 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
27th
of 84 countries
All-time high
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2013
All-time low
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA financial sector rating in Papua New Guinea, 2005–2025

012342005201520252005: 3 1=low to 6=high2006: 3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3 1=low to 6=high2008: 3 1=low to 6=high2009: 3 1=low to 6=high2010: 3 1=low to 6=high2011: 3 1=low to 6=high2012: 3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2020: 3 1=low to 6=high2021: 3 1=low to 6=high2022: 3 1=low to 6=high2023: 3 1=low to 6=high2024: 3 1=low to 6=high2025: 3 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2025, cpia financial sector rating in Papua New Guinea stood at 3 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.

That represents a change of down 14.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia financial sector rating in Papua New Guinea peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

That places Papua New Guinea 27th out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

CPIA financial sector rating in Papua New Guinea, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.5 1=low to 6=high +16.7%
2014 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 3 1=low to 6=high -14.3%
2021 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.35 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Papua New Guinea

  1. 27 Azerbaijan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 27 Benin 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 27 Bhutan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 27 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 27 Burkina Faso 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 27 Burundi 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 27 Cambodia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 27 Cameroon 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 27 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 27 Ethiopia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 27 Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 27 Lesotho 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 27 Liberia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 27 Madagascar 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 27 Maldives 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 27 Mali 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 27 Nigeria 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 27 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 27 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 27 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 27 Togo 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 27 Uzbekistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 27 Vanuatu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  24. 27 Viet Nam 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  25. 27 Zimbabwe 3 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Papua New Guinea

All data for Papua New Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia financial sector rating in Papua New Guinea?
Cpia financial sector rating in Papua New Guinea was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Papua New Guinea?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
What is the lowest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Papua New Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Papua New Guinea rank for cpia financial sector rating?
Papua New Guinea ranks 27th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia financial sector rating rising or falling in Papua New Guinea?
Over the last ten years it is down 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Papua New Guinea data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA financial sector rating in Papua New Guinea. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-financial-sector-rating-1-low-to-6-high/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-financial-sector-rating-1-low-to-6-high/papua-new-guinea/">CPIA financial sector rating in Papua New Guinea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The financial sector criterion assesses the policies and regulations that affect financial sector development. Three dimensions are covered: (a) financial stability; (b) the sector’s efficiency, depth, and resource mobilization strength; and (c) access to financial services.