CPIA gender equality rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of
Bolivia, Plurinational State of: CPIA gender equality rating was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2015. ▲ Rising
CPIA gender equality rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, 2005–2015
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2015, cpia gender equality rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of stood at 4 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
That represents a change of up 14.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia gender equality rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 9th of 85 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.9 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- 9 Azerbaijan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Burundi 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Cambodia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Fiji 4 1=low to 6=high
- 9 Ghana 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Lesotho 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Madagascar 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Mongolia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Nicaragua 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Samoa 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Sri Lanka 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Saint Lucia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Tajikistan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Zimbabwe 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Arms imports 0 SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -23.53 % change on previous year (2020)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 0 SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 24 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2020)
- Tax revenue 17.0% (2007)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 309 (2019)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 9.6% (2007)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP 90.3 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia gender equality rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Cpia gender equality rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2015, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- What is the lowest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank for cpia gender equality rating?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 9th out of 85 countries with data for 2015.
- Is cpia gender equality rating rising or falling in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Bolivia, Plurinational State of data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA gender equality rating criterion assesses the extent to which the country has enacted and put in place institutions and programs to enforce laws and policies that: (a) promote equal access for men and women to human capital development; (b) promote equal access for men and women to productive and economic resources; and (c) give men and women equal status and protection under the law. For the human capital development dimension, the focus is on primary completion and access to secondary education, access to health care during delivery and to family planning, and adolescent fertility rate. For access to economic and productive resources, the focus is on labor force participation, land tenure and property and inheritance rights. For Agency for change and equalization of status and protection under the law the focus is on individual and family rights and personal security (violence against women, trafficking, or sexual harassment) and political participation.