CPIA gender equality rating in Cape Verde
Cape Verde: CPIA gender equality rating was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA gender equality rating in Cape Verde, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia gender equality rating in Cape Verde stood at 4 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia gender equality rating in Cape Verde peaked at 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 4 1=low to 6=high, in 2015.
Cape Verde ranks 9th of 84 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 4.25 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cape Verde
- 9 Azerbaijan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Burundi 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Cambodia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Fiji 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Ghana 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Lesotho 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Madagascar 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Mongolia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Nicaragua 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Samoa 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Sri Lanka 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Saint Lucia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Tajikistan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Zimbabwe 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Cape Verde
- Arms imports 3.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2019)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 5.84 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2019)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0013 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2019)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 3.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2019)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 744.42 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2019)
- Tax revenue 18.4% (2020)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 217.3 (2019)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 22.7% (2020)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP 71.6 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power 2.93 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia gender equality rating in Cape Verde?
- Cpia gender equality rating in Cape Verde was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Cape Verde?
- The highest recorded value was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Cape Verde?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2015.
- How does Cape Verde rank for cpia gender equality rating?
- Cape Verde ranks 9th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia gender equality rating rising or falling in Cape Verde?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cape Verde data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA gender equality rating criterion assesses the extent to which the country has enacted and put in place institutions and programs to enforce laws and policies that: (a) promote equal access for men and women to human capital development; (b) promote equal access for men and women to productive and economic resources; and (c) give men and women equal status and protection under the law. For the human capital development dimension, the focus is on primary completion and access to secondary education, access to health care during delivery and to family planning, and adolescent fertility rate. For access to economic and productive resources, the focus is on labor force participation, land tenure and property and inheritance rights. For Agency for change and equalization of status and protection under the law the focus is on individual and family rights and personal security (violence against women, trafficking, or sexual harassment) and political participation.