CPIA gender equality rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina: CPIA gender equality rating was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▼ Falling
CPIA gender equality rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2005–2013
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Bosnia and Herzegovina recorded 4 1=low to 6=high for cpia gender equality rating in 2013. That is the lowest value across all 9 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia gender equality rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina peaked at 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 4 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Bosnia and Herzegovina 9th out of 85 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the top 10%.
CPIA gender equality rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 4 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +12.5% |
| 2007 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 4 1=low to 6=high | -11.1% |
| 2012 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 4.12 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 9 Azerbaijan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Burundi 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Cambodia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Fiji 4 1=low to 6=high
- 9 Ghana 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Lesotho 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Madagascar 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Mongolia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Nicaragua 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Samoa 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Sri Lanka 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Saint Lucia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Tajikistan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Zimbabwe 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Arms imports 12.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 3.7 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0005 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 12.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 68.25 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0073 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 9.45 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 215.97 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 234.38 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2021)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre 3,854 current USD per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia gender equality rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Cpia gender equality rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The highest recorded value was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- What is the lowest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Bosnia and Herzegovina rank for cpia gender equality rating?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 9th out of 85 countries with data for 2013.
- Is cpia gender equality rating rising or falling in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Bosnia and Herzegovina data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA gender equality rating criterion assesses the extent to which the country has enacted and put in place institutions and programs to enforce laws and policies that: (a) promote equal access for men and women to human capital development; (b) promote equal access for men and women to productive and economic resources; and (c) give men and women equal status and protection under the law. For the human capital development dimension, the focus is on primary completion and access to secondary education, access to health care during delivery and to family planning, and adolescent fertility rate. For access to economic and productive resources, the focus is on labor force participation, land tenure and property and inheritance rights. For Agency for change and equalization of status and protection under the law the focus is on individual and family rights and personal security (violence against women, trafficking, or sexual harassment) and political participation.