CPIA gender equality rating in Europe & Central Asia
Europe & Central Asia: CPIA gender equality rating was 4.12 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA gender equality rating in Europe & Central Asia, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Europe & Central Asia recorded 4.12 1=low to 6=high for cpia gender equality rating in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia gender equality rating in Europe & Central Asia peaked at 4.38 1=low to 6=high in 2008 and was at its lowest, 4 1=low to 6=high, in 2014.
That places Europe & Central Asia 2nd out of 42 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
CPIA gender equality rating in Europe & Central Asia, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 4.1 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 4.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 4.31 1=low to 6=high | +5.2% |
| 2008 | 4.38 1=low to 6=high | +1.4% |
| 2009 | 4.28 1=low to 6=high | -2.2% |
| 2010 | 4.28 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 4.19 1=low to 6=high | -2.1% |
| 2012 | 4.25 1=low to 6=high | +1.5% |
| 2013 | 4.19 1=low to 6=high | -1.5% |
| 2014 | 4 1=low to 6=high | -4.5% |
| 2015 | 4.1 1=low to 6=high | +2.5% |
| 2016 | 4.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 4.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 4.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 4.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 4.12 1=low to 6=high | +0.6% |
| 2021 | 4.12 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 4.12 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 4.12 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 4.12 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 4.12 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.23 1=low to 6=high | 4.1 1=low to 6=high | 4.38 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 4.14 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4.28 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.12 1=low to 6=high | 4.12 1=low to 6=high | 4.12 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia
- 1 Armenia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Bhutan 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Georgia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Republic of Moldova 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Rwanda 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Uzbekistan 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Viet Nam 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Europe & Central Asia
- Arms imports 14.17 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 15.26 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0005 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 23.95 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 14.17 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 774.37 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0245 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 19.52 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 719.05 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 416.81 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia gender equality rating in Europe & Central Asia?
- Cpia gender equality rating in Europe & Central Asia was 4.12 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 4.38 1=low to 6=high in 2008.
- What is the lowest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2014.
- How does Europe & Central Asia rank for cpia gender equality rating?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 2nd out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia gender equality rating rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA gender equality rating criterion assesses the extent to which the country has enacted and put in place institutions and programs to enforce laws and policies that: (a) promote equal access for men and women to human capital development; (b) promote equal access for men and women to productive and economic resources; and (c) give men and women equal status and protection under the law. For the human capital development dimension, the focus is on primary completion and access to secondary education, access to health care during delivery and to family planning, and adolescent fertility rate. For access to economic and productive resources, the focus is on labor force participation, land tenure and property and inheritance rights. For Agency for change and equalization of status and protection under the law the focus is on individual and family rights and personal security (violence against women, trafficking, or sexual harassment) and political participation.