Statizoid

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Kyrgyzstan

Kyrgyzstan: CPIA macroeconomic management rating was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
4 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
14th
of 85 countries
All-time high
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
All-time low
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2013
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Kyrgyzstan, 2005–2025

0123452005201520252005: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2006: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2007: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2008: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2009: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2013: 4 1=low to 6=high2014: 4 1=low to 6=high2015: 4 1=low to 6=high2016: 4 1=low to 6=high2017: 4 1=low to 6=high2018: 4 1=low to 6=high2019: 4 1=low to 6=high2020: 4 1=low to 6=high2021: 4 1=low to 6=high2022: 4 1=low to 6=high2023: 4 1=low to 6=high2024: 4 1=low to 6=high2025: 4 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Kyrgyzstan recorded 4 1=low to 6=high for cpia macroeconomic management rating in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia macroeconomic management rating in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 4 1=low to 6=high, in 2013.

That places Kyrgyzstan 14th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Kyrgyzstan, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 4.5 1=low to 6=high —
2006 4.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 4.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 4.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 4.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 4.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 4.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 4.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 4 1=low to 6=high -11.1%
2014 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 4.5 1=low to 6=high 4.5 1=low to 6=high 4.5 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 4.15 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4.5 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan

  1. 14 Azerbaijan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 14 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 14 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 14 Burkina Faso 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 14 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 14 Cambodia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 14 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 14 Côte d'Ivoire 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 14 Dominica 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 14 Guinea 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 14 Guinea-Bissau 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 14 Guyana 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 14 Madagascar 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 14 Mali 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 14 Nicaragua 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 14 Niger 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 14 Rwanda 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 14 Senegal 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 14 Tajikistan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 14 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 14 Uganda 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 14 Uzbekistan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 14 Vanuatu 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  24. 14 Viet Nam 4 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Kyrgyzstan

All data for Kyrgyzstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia macroeconomic management rating in Kyrgyzstan?
Cpia macroeconomic management rating in Kyrgyzstan was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The highest recorded value was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
What is the lowest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The lowest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
How does Kyrgyzstan rank for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia macroeconomic management rating rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Kyrgyzstan. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-macroeconomic-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-macroeconomic-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/kyrgyz-republic/">CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Kyrgyzstan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.