Statizoid

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Uzbekistan

Uzbekistan: CPIA macroeconomic management rating was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
4 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
13th
of 84 countries
All-time high
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2008
All-time low
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Uzbekistan, 2005–2025

012342005201520252005: 3 1=low to 6=high2006: 3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2008: 4 1=low to 6=high2009: 4 1=low to 6=high2010: 4 1=low to 6=high2011: 4 1=low to 6=high2012: 4 1=low to 6=high2013: 4 1=low to 6=high2014: 4 1=low to 6=high2015: 4 1=low to 6=high2016: 4 1=low to 6=high2017: 4 1=low to 6=high2018: 4 1=low to 6=high2019: 4 1=low to 6=high2020: 4 1=low to 6=high2021: 4 1=low to 6=high2022: 4 1=low to 6=high2023: 4 1=low to 6=high2024: 4 1=low to 6=high2025: 4 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Uzbekistan recorded 4 1=low to 6=high for cpia macroeconomic management rating in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia macroeconomic management rating in Uzbekistan peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2008 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

That places Uzbekistan 13th out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Uzbekistan, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 3.5 1=low to 6=high +16.7%
2008 4 1=low to 6=high +14.3%
2009 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Uzbekistan

  1. 13 Azerbaijan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 13 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 13 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 13 Burkina Faso 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 13 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 13 Cambodia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 13 Democratic Republic of Congo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 13 Cote d'Ivoire 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 13 Dominica 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 13 Guinea 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 13 Guinea-Bissau 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 13 Guyana 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 13 Kyrgyzstan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 13 Madagascar 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 13 Mali 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 13 Nicaragua 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 13 Niger 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 13 Rwanda 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 13 Senegal 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 13 Tajikistan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 13 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 13 Uganda 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 13 Vanuatu 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  24. 13 Vietnam 4 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Uzbekistan

All data for Uzbekistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia macroeconomic management rating in Uzbekistan?
Cpia macroeconomic management rating in Uzbekistan was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Uzbekistan?
The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2008.
What is the lowest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Uzbekistan?
The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Uzbekistan rank for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
Uzbekistan ranks 13th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia macroeconomic management rating rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Uzbekistan. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-macroeconomic-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-macroeconomic-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/uzbekistan/">CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Uzbekistan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.